Nuisance Function Tuning and Sample Splitting for Optimally Estimating a Doubly Robust Functional
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimators of doubly robust functionals typically rely on estimating two complex nuisance functions, such as the propensity score and conditional outcome mean for the average treatment effect functional. We consider the problem of how to estimate nuisance functions to obtain optimal rates of convergence for a doubly robust nonparametric functional that has witnessed applications across the causal inference and conditional independence testing literature. For several plug-in estimators and a first-order bias-corrected estimator, we illustrate the interplay between different tuning parameter choices for the nuisance function estimators and sample splitting strategies on the optimal rate of estimating the functional of interest. For each of these estimators and each sample splitting strategy, we show the necessity to either undersmooth or oversmooth the nuisance function estimators under low regularity conditions to obtain optimal rates of convergence for the functional of interest. Unlike the existing literature, we show that plug-in and first-order bias-corrected estimators can achieve minimax rates of convergence across all H"older smoothness classes of the nuisance functions by careful combinations of sample splitting and nuisance function tuning strategies. We complement these results with numerical simulations illustrating the impact of different nuisance function tuning and sample splitting strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026On the Asymptotic Inadmissibility of Double Machine Learning Estimators Under Structure-Agnostic Modelscited by 3
- 2023Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimatorscited by 2
- 2026When a High Score Is an Illusion: Certifying Genuine versus Repackaged Forecasting Skillcited by 0
- 2026When a High Score Is an Illusion: Certifying Genuine versus Repackaged Forecasting Skill16 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Asymptotic Inadmissibility of Double Machine Learning Estimators Under Structure-Agnostic Models21 Jun 2026
- 2023Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators18 Jun 2023