An Experience-based Direct Generation approach to Automatic Image Cropping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic Image Cropping is a challenging task with many practical downstream applications. The task is often divided into sub-problems - generating cropping candidates, finding the visually important regions, and determining aesthetics to select the most appealing candidate. Prior approaches model one or more of these sub-problems separately, and often combine them sequentially. We propose a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) based method to crop images directly, without explicitly modeling image aesthetics, evaluating multiple crop candidates, or detecting visually salient regions. Our model is trained on a large dataset of images cropped by experienced editors and can simultaneously predict bounding boxes for multiple fixed aspect ratios. We consider the aspect ratio of the cropped image to be a critical factor that influences aesthetics. Prior approaches for automatic image cropping, did not enforce the aspect ratio of the outputs, likely due to a lack of datasets for this task. We, therefore, benchmark our method on public datasets for two related tasks - first, aesthetic image cropping without regard to aspect ratio, and second, thumbnail generation that requires fixed aspect ratio outputs, but where aesthetics are not crucial. We show that our strategy is competitive with or performs better than existing methods in both these tasks. Furthermore, our one-stage model is easier to train and significantly faster than existing two-stage or end-to-end methods for inference. We present a qualitative evaluation study, and find that our model is able to generalize to diverse images from unseen datasets and often retains compositional properties of the original images after cropping. Our results demonstrate that explicitly modeling image aesthetics or visual attention regions is not necessarily required to build a competitive image cropping algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2019Salient Object Detection in the Deep Learning Era: An In-Depth Surveycited by 163
- 2016Image Aesthetic Assessment: An Experimental Surveycited by 50
- 2019Reliable and Efficient Image Cropping: A Grid Anchor based Approachcited by 32
- 2020Adaptive Fractional Dilated Convolution Network for Image Aesthetics Assessmentcited by 28
- 2017Quantitative Analysis of Automatic Image Cropping Algorithms: A Dataset and Comparative Studycited by 26
8 more
- 2019Grid Anchor based Image Cropping: A New Benchmark and An Efficient Modelcited by 25
- 2017Learning to Compose with Professional Photographs on the Webcited by 24
- 2019Image Cropping with Composition and Saliency Aware Aesthetic Score Mapcited by 20
- 2017Deep Cropping via Attention Box Prediction and Aesthetics Assessmentcited by 16
- 2017Automatic Image Cropping for Visual Aesthetic Enhancement Using Deep Neural Networks and Cascaded Regressioncited by 11
- 2016Fast-AT: Fast Automatic Thumbnail Generation using Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2019Listwise View Ranking for Image Croppingcited by 6
- 2019An End-to-End Neural Network for Image Cropping by Learning Composition from Aesthetic Photoscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.