mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Near-Tight Algorithms for the Chamberlin-Courant and Thiele Voting Rules

arXiv 2212.14173 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2022cs.GT cs.DS cs.MAcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an almost optimal algorithm for the classic Chamberlin-Courant multiwinner voting rule (CC) on single-peaked preference profiles. Given n voters and m candidates, it runs in almost linear time in the input size, improving the previous best O(nm2) time algorithm of Betzler et al. (2013). We also study multiwinner voting rules on nearly single-peaked preference profiles in terms of the candidate-deletion operation. We show a polynomial-time algorithm for CC where a given candidate-deletion set D has logarithmic size. Actually, our algorithm runs in 2|D| · poly(n,m) time and the base of the power cannot be improved under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. We also adapt these results to all non-constant Thiele rules which generalize CC with approval ballots.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.