mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characteristics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse Hyperbolic Problems

arXiv 2212.14012 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2022cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose characteristics-informed neural networks (CINN), a simple and efficient machine learning approach for solving forward and inverse problems involving hyperbolic PDEs. Like physics-informed neural networks (PINN), CINN is a meshless machine learning solver with universal approximation capabilities. Unlike PINN, which enforces a PDE softly via a multi-part loss function, CINN encodes the characteristics of the PDE in a general-purpose deep neural network by adding a characteristic layer. This neural network is trained with the usual MSE data-fitting regression loss and does not require residual losses on collocation points. This leads to faster training and can avoid well-known pathologies of gradient descent optimization of multi-part PINN loss functions. This paper focuses on linear transport phenomena, in which case it is shown that, if the characteristic ODEs can be solved exactly, then the output of a CINN is an exact solution of the PDE, even at initialization, preventing the occurrence of non-physical solutions. In addition, a CINN can also be trained with soft penalty constraints that enforce, for example, periodic or Neumman boundary conditions, without losing the property that the output satisfies the PDE automatically. We also propose an architecture that extends the CINN approach to linear hyperbolic systems of PDEs. All CINN architectures proposed here can be trained end-to-end from sample data using standard deep learning software. Experiments with the simple advection equation, a stiff periodic advection equation, and an acoustics problem where data from one field is used to predict the other, unseen field, indicate that CINN is able to improve on the accuracy of the baseline PINN, in some cases by a considerable margin, while also being significantly faster to train and avoiding non-physical solutions. An extension to nonlinear PDEs is also briefly discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2022.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  2. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 233
  5. 2021Parallel Physics-Informed Neural Networks via Domain Decompositioncited by 112
  6. 2019Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 92
  7. 2020A Method for Representing Periodic Functions and Enforcing Exactly Periodic Boundary Conditions with Deep Neural Networkscited by 87
  8. 2019Physical Symmetries Embedded in Neural Networkscited by 40
  9. 2020PFNN: A Penalty-Free Neural Network Method for Solving a Class of Second-Order Boundary-Value Problems on Complex Geometriescited by 38
  10. 2022Lagrangian PINNs: A causality-conforming solution to failure modes of physics-informed neural networkscited by 26
  11. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Localized Artificial Viscositycited by 22
  12. 2020Physics Informed Deep Learning for Transport in Porous Media. Buckley Leverett Problemcited by 10
2 more
  1. 2020Finite Difference Neural Networks: Fast Prediction of Partial Differential Equationscited by 4
  2. 2022Learning finite difference methods for reaction-diffusion type equations with FCNNcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

5 papers.