mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Social-Aware Clustered Federated Learning with Customized Privacy Preservation

arXiv 2212.13992 ↗First posted 25 Dec 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A key feature of federated learning (FL) is to preserve the data privacy of end users. However, there still exist potential privacy leakage in exchanging gradients under FL. As a result, recent research often explores the differential privacy (DP) approaches to add noises to the computing results to address privacy concerns with low overheads, which however degrade the model performance. In this paper, we strike the balance of data privacy and efficiency by utilizing the pervasive social connections between users. Specifically, we propose SCFL, a novel Social-aware Clustered Federated Learning scheme, where mutually trusted individuals can freely form a social cluster and aggregate their raw model updates (e.g., gradients) inside each cluster before uploading to the cloud for global aggregation. By mixing model updates in a social group, adversaries can only eavesdrop the social-layer combined results, but not the privacy of individuals. We unfold the design of SCFL in three steps.i) Stable social cluster formation. Considering users' heterogeneous training samples and data distributions, we formulate the optimal social cluster formation problem as a federation game and devise a fair revenue allocation mechanism to resist free-riders. ii) Differentiated trust-privacy mapping}. For the clusters with low mutual trust, we design a customizable privacy preservation mechanism to adaptively sanitize participants' model updates depending on social trust degrees. iii) Distributed convergence}. A distributed two-sided matching algorithm is devised to attain an optimized disjoint partition with Nash-stable convergence. Experiments on Facebook network and MNIST/CIFAR-10 datasets validate that our SCFL can effectively enhance learning utility, improve user payoff, and enforce customizable privacy protection.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2022.

Builds on

15 of 60 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  3. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  4. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  5. 2019Federated Learning over Wireless Networks: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocationcited by 93
  6. 2021FedNLP: Benchmarking Federated Learning Methods for Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 84
  7. 2020Privacy For Free: Wireless Federated Learning Via Uncoded Transmission With Adaptive Power Controlcited by 62
  8. 2020To Talk or to Work: Flexible Communication Compression for Energy Efficient Federated Learning over Heterogeneous Mobile Edge Devicescited by 45
  9. 2020Multi-Stage Hybrid Federated Learning over Large-Scale D2D-Enabled Fog Networkscited by 42
  10. 2021Gradient-Leakage Resilient Federated Learningcited by 40
  11. 2019Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Marketcited by 38
  12. 2022FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attackscited by 29
3 more
  1. 2021Low-Latency Federated Learning over Wireless Channels with Differential Privacycited by 24
  2. 2021Privacy Amplification for Federated Learning via User Sampling and Wireless Aggregationcited by 22
  3. 2022A Platform-Free Proof of Federated Learning Consensus Mechanism for Sustainable Blockchainscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

5 papers.