mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Recognition and Classification of Future Work Sentences from Academic Articles in a Specific Domain

arXiv 2212.13860 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2022cs.CL cs.DLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Future work sentences (FWS) are the particular sentences in academic papers that contain the author's description of their proposed follow-up research direction. This paper presents methods to automatically extract FWS from academic papers and classify them according to the different future directions embodied in the paper's content. FWS recognition methods will enable subsequent researchers to locate future work sentences more accurately and quickly and reduce the time and cost of acquiring the corpus. The current work on automatic identification of future work sentences is relatively small, and the existing research cannot accurately identify FWS from academic papers, and thus cannot conduct data mining on a large scale. Furthermore, there are many aspects to the content of future work, and the subdivision of the content is conducive to the analysis of specific development directions. In this paper, Nature Language Processing (NLP) is used as a case study, and FWS are extracted from academic papers and classified into different types. We manually build an annotated corpus with six different types of FWS. Then, automatic recognition and classification of FWS are implemented using machine learning models, and the performance of these models is compared based on the evaluation metrics. The results show that the Bernoulli Bayesian model has the best performance in the automatic recognition task, with the Macro F1 reaching 90.73%, and the SCIBERT model has the best performance in the automatic classification task, with the weighted average F1 reaching 72.63%. Finally, we extract keywords from FWS and gain a deep understanding of the key content described in FWS, and we also demonstrate that content determination in FWS will be reflected in the subsequent research work by measuring the similarity between future work sentences and the abstracts.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2022.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  6. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  7. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
  8. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  9. 2015Mining and Analyzing the Future Works in Scientific Articlescited by 2
  10. 2017A Bibliometric Model for Identifying Emerging Research Topicscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

4 papers.