mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sensing-Throughput Tradeoffs with Generative Adversarial Networks for NextG Spectrum Sharing

arXiv 2212.13598 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2022cs.NI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spectrum coexistence is essential for next generation (NextG) systems to share the spectrum with incumbent (primary) users and meet the growing demand for bandwidth. One example is the 3.5 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band, where the 5G and beyond communication systems need to sense the spectrum and then access the channel in an opportunistic manner when the incumbent user (e.g., radar) is not transmitting. To that end, a high-fidelity classifier based on a deep neural network is needed for low misdetection (to protect incumbent users) and low false alarm (to achieve high throughput for NextG). In a dynamic wireless environment, the classifier can only be used for a limited period of time, i.e., coherence time. A portion of this period is used for learning to collect sensing results and train a classifier, and the rest is used for transmissions. In spectrum sharing systems, there is a well-known tradeoff between the sensing time and the transmission time. While increasing the sensing time can increase the spectrum sensing accuracy, there is less time left for data transmissions. In this paper, we present a generative adversarial network (GAN) approach to generate synthetic sensing results to augment the training data for the deep learning classifier so that the sensing time can be reduced (and thus the transmission time can be increased) while keeping high accuracy of the classifier. We consider both additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh channels, and show that this GAN-based approach can significantly improve both the protection of the high-priority user and the throughput of the NextG user (more in Rayleigh channels than AWGN channels).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2022.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  2. 2017Over the Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classificationcited by 121
  3. 2017Distributed Deep Learning Models for Wireless Signal Classification with Low-Cost Spectrum Sensorscited by 44
  4. 2020Deep Learning for Wireless Communicationscited by 39
  5. 2018Deep Learning for Launching and Mitigating Wireless Jamming Attackscited by 31
  6. 2019Deep Learning for RF Signal Classification in Unknown and Dynamic Spectrum Environmentscited by 28
  7. 2018Approximating the Void: Learning Stochastic Channel Models from Observation with Variational Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
  8. 2019Generative Adversarial Network for Wireless Signal Spoofingcited by 21
  9. 2020Generative Adversarial Network in the Air: Deep Adversarial Learning for Wireless Signal Spoofingcited by 14
  10. 2021Adversarial Machine Learning for 5G Communications Securitycited by 12
  11. 2018Deep Learning Classification of 3.5 GHz Band Spectrograms with Applications to Spectrum Sensingcited by 11
  12. 2018Generative Adversarial Learning for Spectrum Sensingcited by 10
3 more
  1. 2022Machine Learning in NextG Networks via Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 8
  2. 2022IoTGAN: GAN Powered Camouflage Against Machine Learning Based IoT Device Identificationcited by 3
  3. 2021End-to-End Autoencoder Communications with Optimized Interference Suppressioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.