mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Cross-vendor Mammographic Texture Models Using Augmentation-based Domain Adaptation for Long-term Breast Cancer Risk

arXiv 2212.13439 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2022cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Risk-stratified breast cancer screening might improve early detection and efficiency without comprising quality. However, modern mammography-based risk models do not ensure adaptation across vendor-domains and rely on cancer precursors, associated with short-term risk, which might limit long-term risk assessment. We report a cross-vendor mammographic texture model for long-term risk. Approach: The texture model was robustly trained using two systematically designed case-control datasets. Textural features, indicative of future breast cancer, were learned by excluding samples with diagnosed/potential malignancies from training. An augmentation-based domain adaption technique, based on flavorization of mammographic views, ensured generalization across vendor-domains. The model was validated in 66,607 consecutively screened Danish women with flavorized Siemens views and 25,706 Dutch women with Hologic-processed views. Performances were evaluated for interval cancers (IC) within two years from screening and long-term cancers (LTC) from two years after screening. The texture model was combined with established risk factors to flag 10% of women with the highest risk. Results: In Danish women, the texture model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.71 and 0.65 for ICs and LTCs, respectively. In Dutch women with Hologic-processed views, the AUCs were not different from AUCs in Danish women with flavorized views. The AUC for texture combined with established risk factors increased to 0.68 for LTCs. The 10% of women flagged as high-risk accounted for 25.5% of ICs and 24.8% of LTCs. Conclusions: The texture model robustly estimated long-term breast cancer risk while adapting to an unseen processed vendor-domain and identified a clinically relevant high-risk subgroup.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2022.

Builds on

8 of 37 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
  5. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
  6. 2017Stabilizing Training of Generative Adversarial Networks through Regularizationcited by 118
  7. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  8. 2020Decoupling Inherent Risk and Early Cancer Signs in Image-based Breast Cancer Risk Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.