Forecasting through deep learning and modal decomposition in two-phase concentric jets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work aims to improve fuel chamber injectors' performance in turbofan engines, thus implying improved performance and reduction of pollutants. This requires the development of models that allow real-time prediction and improvement of the fuel/air mixture. However, the work carried out to date involves using experimental data (complicated to measure) or the numerical resolution of the complete problem (computationally prohibitive). The latter involves the resolution of a system of partial differential equations (PDE). These problems make difficult to develop a real-time prediction tool. Therefore, in this work, we propose using machine learning in conjunction with (complementarily cheaper) single-phase flow numerical simulations in the presence of tangential discontinuities to estimate the mixing process in two-phase flows. In this meaning we study the application of two proposed neural network (NN) models as PDE surrogate models. Where the future dynamics is predicted by the NN, given some preliminary information. We show the low computational cost required by these models, both in their training and inference phases. We also show how NN training can be improved by reducing data complexity through a modal decomposition technique called higher order dynamic mode decomposition (HODMD), which identifies the main structures inside flow dynamics and reconstructs the original flow using only these main structures. This reconstruction has the same number of samples and spatial dimension as the original flow, but with a less complex dynamics and preserving its main features. The core idea of this work is to test the limits of applicability of deep learning models to data forecasting in complex fluid dynamics problems. Generalization capabilities of the models are demonstrated by using the same NN architectures to forecast the future dynamics of four different two-phase flows.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2022.
Builds on
3 of 39 references.
References · 3
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 196
- 2016Inductive Bias of Deep Convolutional Networks through Pooling Geometrycited by 53
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Stability analysis of chaotic systems in latent spacescited by 7
- 2024Generalization capabilities and robustness of hybrid models grounded in physics compared to purely deep learning modelscited by 1
- 2024LC-SVD-DLinear: A low-cost physics-based hybrid machine learning model for data forecasting using sparse measurementscited by 0
- 2024LC-SVD-DLinear: A low-cost physics-based hybrid machine learning model for data forecasting using sparse measurements26 Nov 2024
- 2024Stability analysis of chaotic systems in latent spaces1 Oct 2024
- 2024Generalization capabilities and robustness of hybrid models grounded in physics compared to purely deep learning models27 Apr 2024