Intransitively winning chess players positions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Positions of chess players in intransitive (rock-paper-scissors) relations are considered. Namely, position A of White is preferable (it should be chosen if choice is possible) to position B of Black, position B of Black is preferable to position C of White, position C of White is preferable to position D of Black, but position D of Black is preferable to position A of White. Intransitivity of winningness of positions of chess players is considered to be a consequence of complexity of the chess environment -- in contrast with simpler games with transitive positions only. The space of relations between winningness of positions of chess players is non-Euclidean. The Zermelo-von Neumann theorem is complemented by statements about possibility vs. impossibility of building pure winning strategies based on the assumption of transitivity of positions of chess players. Questions about the possibility of intransitive positions of players in other positional games are raised.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2022.
Builds on
1 of 31 references.
References · 1
- 2017A Game of Nontransitive Dicecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.