mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigation of Network Architecture for Multimodal Head-and-Neck Tumor Segmentation

arXiv 2212.10724 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inspired by the recent success of Transformers for Natural Language Processing and vision Transformer for Computer Vision, many researchers in the medical imaging community have flocked to Transformer-based networks for various main stream medical tasks such as classification, segmentation, and estimation. In this study, we analyze, two recently published Transformer-based network architectures for the task of multimodal head-and-tumor segmentation and compare their performance to the de facto standard 3D segmentation network - the nnU-Net. Our results showed that modeling long-range dependencies may be helpful in cases where large structures are present and/or large field of view is needed. However, for small structures such as head-and-neck tumor, the convolution-based U-Net architecture seemed to perform well, especially when training dataset is small and computational resource is limited.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.

Builds on

6 of 9 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
  3. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 823
  4. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 305
  5. 2021ViT-V-Net: Vision Transformer for Unsupervised Volumetric Medical Image Registrationcited by 87
  6. 2021Is it Time to Replace CNNs with Transformers for Medical Images?cited by 60

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.