mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoralDial: A Framework to Train and Evaluate Moral Dialogue Systems via Moral Discussions

arXiv 2212.10720 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Morality in dialogue systems has raised great attention in research recently. A moral dialogue system aligned with users' values could enhance conversation engagement and user connections. In this paper, we propose a framework, MoralDial to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems. In our framework, we first explore the communication mechanisms of morality and resolve expressed morality into three parts, which indicate the roadmap for building a moral dialogue system. Based on that, we design a simple yet effective method: constructing moral discussions between simulated specific users and the dialogue system. The constructed discussions consist of expressing, explaining, revising, and inferring moral views in dialogue exchanges, which makes conversational models learn morality well in a natural manner. Furthermore, we propose a novel evaluation method under the framework. We evaluate the multiple aspects of morality by judging the relation between dialogue responses and human values in discussions, where the multifaceted nature of morality is particularly considered. Automatic and manual experiments demonstrate that our framework is promising to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.

Builds on

28 of 44 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  6. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  7. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  8. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  10. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
  11. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  12. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
16 more
  1. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  2. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 652
  3. 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
  4. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 470
  5. 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 255
  6. 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
  7. 2020Recipes for Safety in Open-domain Chatbotscited by 170
  8. 2020Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skillscited by 131
  9. 2022ProsocialDialog: A Prosocial Backbone for Conversational Agentscited by 109
  10. 2022The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systemscited by 93
  11. 2017Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systemscited by 86
  12. 2018From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and Opportunities with Social Chatbotscited by 85
  13. 2021Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Toolingcited by 78
  14. 2021On the Safety of Conversational Models: Taxonomy, Dataset, and Benchmarkcited by 73
  15. 2021ValueNet: A New Dataset for Human Value Driven Dialogue Systemcited by 34
  16. 2021A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)cited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 8; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: