Multiple testing under negative dependence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The multiple testing literature has primarily dealt with three types of dependence assumptions between p-values: independence, positive regression dependence, and arbitrary dependence. In this paper, we provide what we believe are the first theoretical results under various notions of negative dependence (negative Gaussian dependence, negative regression dependence, negative association, negative orthant dependence and weak negative dependence). These include the Simes global null test and the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, which are known experimentally to be anti-conservative under negative dependence. The anti-conservativeness of these procedures is bounded by factors smaller than that under arbitrary dependence (in particular, by factors independent of the number of hypotheses). We also provide new results about negatively dependent e-values, and provide several examples as to when negative dependence may arise. Our proofs are elementary and short, thus amenable to extensions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Max-Rank: Efficient Multiple Testing for Conformal Predictioncited by 6
- 2025From Individual Experience to Collective Evidence: A Reporting-Based Framework for Identifying Systemic Harmscited by 3
- 2024Combining Evidence Across Filtrationscited by 2
- 2026On Nonasymptotic Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects in Randomized Experimentscited by 0
- 2026On Nonasymptotic Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments16 Jan 2026
- 2025From Individual Experience to Collective Evidence: A Reporting-Based Framework for Identifying Systemic Harms12 Feb 2025
- 2024Combining Evidence Across Filtrations15 Feb 2024
- 2023Max-Rank: Efficient Multiple Testing for Conformal Prediction17 Nov 2023