Explaining Classifications to Non Experts: An XAI User Study of Post Hoc Explanations for a Classifier When People Lack Expertise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Very few eXplainable AI (XAI) studies consider how users understanding of explanations might change depending on whether they know more or less about the to be explained domain (i.e., whether they differ in their expertise). Yet, expertise is a critical facet of most high stakes, human decision making (e.g., understanding how a trainee doctor differs from an experienced consultant). Accordingly, this paper reports a novel, user study (N=96) on how peoples expertise in a domain affects their understanding of post-hoc explanations by example for a deep-learning, black box classifier. The results show that peoples understanding of explanations for correct and incorrect classifications changes dramatically, on several dimensions (e.g., response times, perceptions of correctness and helpfulness), when the image-based domain considered is familiar (i.e., MNIST) as opposed to unfamiliar (i.e., Kannada MNIST). The wider implications of these new findings for XAI strategies are discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.
Builds on
8 of 35 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
- 2020The Role of Domain Expertise in User Trust and the Impact of First Impressions with Intelligent Systemscited by 34
- 2020An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognitioncited by 30
- 2022Features of Explainability: How users understand counterfactual and causal explanations for categorical and continuous features in XAIcited by 16
- 2016Improving Human-Machine Cooperative Visual Search With Soft Highlightingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
8 papers.
- 2023The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 21
- 2024Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracycited by 5
- 2025Exploring the Impact of Explainable AI and Cognitive Capabilities on Users' Decisionscited by 1
- 2025Beyond Satisfaction: From Placebic to Actionable Explanations For Enhanced Understandabilitycited by 1
- 2024Mean Opinion Score as a New Metric for User-Evaluation of XAI Methodscited by 0
- 2024Explainable few-shot learning workflow for detecting invasive and exotic tree speciescited by 0
- 2024Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithmscited by 0
- 2025Feature-Guided Neighbor Selection for Non-Expert Evaluation of Model Predictionscited by 0
- 2025Beyond Satisfaction: From Placebic to Actionable Explanations For Enhanced Understandability6 Dec 2025
- 2025Feature-Guided Neighbor Selection for Non-Expert Evaluation of Model Predictions8 Jul 2025
- 2025Exploring the Impact of Explainable AI and Cognitive Capabilities on Users' Decisions2 May 2025
- 2024Explainable few-shot learning workflow for detecting invasive and exotic tree species1 Nov 2024
- 2024Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithms21 Oct 2024
- 2024Mean Opinion Score as a New Metric for User-Evaluation of XAI Methods29 Jul 2024
- 2024Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracy8 Apr 2024
- 2023The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making25 Jul 2023