Deep learning applied to computational mechanics: A comprehensive review, state of the art, and the classics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Three recent breakthroughs due to AI in arts and science serve as motivation: An award winning digital image, protein folding, fast matrix multiplication. Many recent developments in artificial neural networks, particularly deep learning (DL), applied and relevant to computational mechanics (solid, fluids, finite-element technology) are reviewed in detail. Both hybrid and pure machine learning (ML) methods are discussed. Hybrid methods combine traditional PDE discretizations with ML methods either (1) to help model complex nonlinear constitutive relations, (2) to nonlinearly reduce the model order for efficient simulation (turbulence), or (3) to accelerate the simulation by predicting certain components in the traditional integration methods. Here, methods (1) and (2) relied on Long-Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture, with method (3) relying on convolutional neural networks. Pure ML methods to solve (nonlinear) PDEs are represented by Physics-Informed Neural network (PINN) methods, which could be combined with attention mechanism to address discontinuous solutions. Both LSTM and attention architectures, together with modern and generalized classic optimizers to include stochasticity for DL networks, are extensively reviewed. Kernel machines, including Gaussian processes, are provided to sufficient depth for more advanced works such as shallow networks with infinite width. Not only addressing experts, readers are assumed familiar with computational mechanics, but not with DL, whose concepts and applications are built up from the basics, aiming at bringing first-time learners quickly to the forefront of research. History and limitations of AI are recounted and discussed, with particular attention at pointing out misstatements or misconceptions of the classics, even in well-known references. Positioning and pointing control of a large-deformable beam is given as an example.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2022.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023LS-DYNA Machine Learning-based Multiscale Method for Nonlinear Modeling of Short Fiber-Reinforced Compositescited by 6
- 2025Examining the Source of Defects from a Mechanical Perspective for 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 4
- 2024SLIDE: A machine-learning based method for forced dynamic response estimation of multibody systemscited by 1
- 2024Partial-differential-algebraic equations of nonlinear dynamics by Physics-Informed Neural-Network: (I) Operator splitting and framework assessmentcited by 0
- 2025Localization of Impacts on Thin-Walled Structures by Recurrent Neural Networks: End-to-end Learning from Real-World Datacited by 0
- 2025Localization of Impacts on Thin-Walled Structures by Recurrent Neural Networks: End-to-end Learning from Real-World Data13 May 2025
- 2025Examining the Source of Defects from a Mechanical Perspective for 3D Anomaly Detection9 May 2025
- 2024SLIDE: A machine-learning based method for forced dynamic response estimation of multibody systems26 Sep 2024
- 2024Partial-differential-algebraic equations of nonlinear dynamics by Physics-Informed Neural-Network: (I) Operator splitting and framework assessment13 Jul 2024
- 2023LS-DYNA Machine Learning-based Multiscale Method for Nonlinear Modeling of Short Fiber-Reinforced Composites6 Jan 2023