mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spatially-resolved Thermometry from Line-of-Sight Emission Spectroscopy via Machine Learning

arXiv 2212.07836 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2022cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A methodology is proposed, which addresses the caveat that line-of-sight emission spectroscopy presents in that it cannot provide spatially resolved temperature measurements in nonhomogeneous temperature fields. The aim of this research is to explore the use of data-driven models in measuring temperature distributions in a spatially resolved manner using emission spectroscopy data. Two categories of data-driven methods are analyzed: (i) Feature engineering and classical machine learning algorithms, and (ii) end-to-end convolutional neural networks (CNN). In total, combinations of fifteen feature groups and fifteen classical machine learning models, and eleven CNN models are considered and their performances explored. The results indicate that the combination of feature engineering and machine learning provides better performance than the direct use of CNN. Notably, feature engineering which is comprised of physics-guided transformation, signal representation-based feature extraction and Principal Component Analysis is found to be the most effective. Moreover, it is shown that when using the extracted features, the ensemble-based, light blender learning model offers the best performance with RMSE, RE, RRMSE and R values of 64.3, 0.017, 0.025 and 0.994, respectively. The proposed method, based on feature engineering and the light blender model, is capable of measuring nonuniform temperature distributions from low-resolution spectra, even when the species concentration distribution in the gas mixtures is unknown.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2022.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  6. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  7. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  8. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  9. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  10. 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
  11. 2015A Mathematical Theory of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Feature Extractioncited by 46

Built on by

Not cited yet.