Identifying and Explaining Safety-critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles via Key Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is of utmost importance and testing them in simulated environments is a safer option than conducting in-field operational tests. However, generating an exhaustive test suite to identify critical test scenarios is computationally expensive as the representation of each test is complex and contains various dynamic and static features, such as the AV under test, road participants (vehicles, pedestrians, and static obstacles), environmental factors (weather and light), and the road's structural features (lanes, turns, road speed, etc.). In this paper, we present a systematic technique that uses Instance Space Analysis (ISA) to identify the significant features of test scenarios that affect their ability to reveal the unsafe behaviour of AVs. ISA identifies the features that best differentiate safety-critical scenarios from normal driving and visualises the impact of these features on test scenario outcomes (safe/unsafe) in 2D. This visualization helps to identify untested regions of the instance space and provides an indicator of the quality of the test suite in terms of the percentage of feature space covered by testing. To test the predictive ability of the identified features, we train five Machine Learning classifiers to classify test scenarios as safe or unsafe. The high precision, recall, and F1 scores indicate that our proposed approach is effective in predicting the outcome of a test scenario without executing it and can be used for test generation, selection, and prioritization.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Modelscited by 10
- 2024Benchmarking Generative AI Models for Deep Learning Test Input Generationcited by 4
- 2025Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systemscited by 4
- 2024Targeted Deep Learning System Boundary Testingcited by 3
- 2024Can Search-Based Testing with Pareto Optimization Effectively Cover Failure-Revealing Test Inputs?cited by 1
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 1
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026HyperNet-Adaptation for Diffusion-Based Test Case Generationcited by 0
- 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 0
- 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems6 Jul 2026
- 2026HyperNet-Adaptation for Diffusion-Based Test Case Generation21 Jan 2026
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directions9 Dec 2025
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safety27 Feb 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systems21 Jan 2025
- 2024Benchmarking Generative AI Models for Deep Learning Test Input Generation23 Dec 2024
- 2024Can Search-Based Testing with Pareto Optimization Effectively Cover Failure-Revealing Test Inputs?15 Oct 2024
- 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Models20 Sep 2024
- 2024Targeted Deep Learning System Boundary Testing12 Aug 2024