Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the real-world impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has been steadily growing, so too have these systems come under increasing scrutiny. In response, the study of AI fairness has rapidly developed into a rich field of research with links to computer science, social science, law, and philosophy. Many technical solutions for measuring and achieving AI fairness have been proposed, yet their approach has been criticized in recent years for being misleading, unrealistic and harmful. In our paper, we survey these criticisms of AI fairness and identify key limitations that are inherent to the prototypical paradigm of AI fairness. By carefully outlining the extent to which technical solutions can realistically help in achieving AI fairness, we aim to provide the background necessary to form a nuanced opinion on developments in fair AI. This delineation also provides research opportunities for non-AI solutions peripheral to AI systems in supporting fair decision processes.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2024Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 9
- 2023fairret: a Framework for Differentiable Fairness Regularization Termscited by 8
- 2024ABCFair: an Adaptable Benchmark approach for Comparing Fairness Methodscited by 8
- 2023Fairness Hacking: The Malicious Practice of Shrouding Unfairness in Algorithmscited by 5
- 2023Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithmscited by 2
- 2024Fairness Auditing with Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 2
- 2024Runtime Monitoring and Enforcement of Conditional Fairness in Generative AIscited by 2
- 2024Rolling in the deep of cognitive and AI biasescited by 2
- 2025A Multimodal GUI Architecture for Interfacing with LLM-Based Conversational Assistantscited by 1
- 2026Computational Compliance for AI Regulation: Blueprint for a New Research Domaincited by 1
- 2026Measuring Individual User Fairness with User Similarity and Effectiveness Disparitycited by 1
- 2026No-Free-Fairness: Fundamental Limits and Trade-offs in Learning Systemscited by 0
- 2026No-Free-Fairness: Fundamental Limits and Trade-offs in Learning Systems16 Jun 2026
- 2026Measuring Individual User Fairness with User Similarity and Effectiveness Disparity23 Jan 2026
- 2026Computational Compliance for AI Regulation: Blueprint for a New Research Domain8 Jan 2026
- 2025A Multimodal GUI Architecture for Interfacing with LLM-Based Conversational Assistants31 Aug 2025
- 2024ABCFair: an Adaptable Benchmark approach for Comparing Fairness Methods25 Sep 2024
- 2024Rolling in the deep of cognitive and AI biases30 Jul 2024
- 2024Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Models28 Jun 2024
- 2024Runtime Monitoring and Enforcement of Conditional Fairness in Generative AIs25 Apr 2024
- 2024Fairness Auditing with Multi-Agent Collaboration13 Feb 2024
- 2023Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms21 Nov 2023
- 2023Fairness Hacking: The Malicious Practice of Shrouding Unfairness in Algorithms12 Nov 2023
- 2023fairret: a Framework for Differentiable Fairness Regularization Terms26 Oct 2023