Mixed Supervision of Histopathology Improves Prostate Cancer Classification from MRI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Non-invasive prostate cancer detection from MRI has the potential to revolutionize patient care by providing early detection of clinically-significant disease (ISUP grade group >= 2), but has thus far shown limited positive predictive value. To address this, we present an MRI-based deep learning method for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer applicable to a patient population with subsequent ground truth biopsy results ranging from benign pathology to ISUP grade group~5. Specifically, we demonstrate that mixed supervision via diverse histopathological ground truth improves classification performance despite the cost of reduced concordance with image-based segmentation. That is, where prior approaches have utilized pathology results as ground truth derived from targeted biopsies and whole-mount prostatectomy to strongly supervise the localization of clinically significant cancer, our approach also utilizes weak supervision signals extracted from nontargeted systematic biopsies with regional localization to improve overall performance. Our key innovation is performing regression by distribution rather than simply by value, enabling use of additional pathology findings traditionally ignored by deep learning strategies. We evaluated our model on a dataset of 973 (testing n=160) multi-parametric prostate MRI exams collected at UCSF from 2015-2018 followed by MRI/ultrasound fusion (targeted) biopsy and systematic (nontargeted) biopsy of the prostate gland, demonstrating that deep networks trained with mixed supervision of histopathology can significantly exceed the performance of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) clinical standard for prostate MRI interpretation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2022.
Builds on
6 of 30 references.
References · 6
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
- 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
- 2017Superhuman Accuracy on the SNEMI3D Connectomics Challengecited by 64
- 2021Deep Learning for fully automatic detection, segmentation, and Gleason Grade estimation of prostate cancer in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imagescited by 14
- 2022ProstAttention-Net: A deep attention model for prostate cancer segmentation by aggressiveness in MRI scanscited by 14
- 2022Learning to segment prostate cancer by aggressiveness from scribbles in bi-parametric MRIcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Promptable cancer segmentation using minimal expert-curated datacited by 2
- 2024Enhanced Cascade Prostate Cancer Classifier in mp-MRI Utilizing Recall Feedback Adaptive Loss and Prior Knowledge-Based Feature Extractioncited by 0
- 2026Histopathological Spectrum-Guided Prostate Stratification via Segmentation-Assisted Diagnostic Transformercited by 0
- 2026Histopathological Spectrum-Guided Prostate Stratification via Segmentation-Assisted Diagnostic Transformer19 Jul 2026
- 2025Promptable cancer segmentation using minimal expert-curated data23 May 2025
- 2024Enhanced Cascade Prostate Cancer Classifier in mp-MRI Utilizing Recall Feedback Adaptive Loss and Prior Knowledge-Based Feature Extraction19 Aug 2024