Mitigation of Spatial Nonstationarity with Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spatial nonstationarity, the location variance of features' statistical distributions, is ubiquitous in many natural settings. For example, in geological reservoirs rock matrix porosity varies vertically due to geomechanical compaction trends, in mineral deposits grades vary due to sedimentation and concentration processes, in hydrology rainfall varies due to the atmosphere and topography interactions, and in metallurgy crystalline structures vary due to differential cooling. Conventional geostatistical modeling workflows rely on the assumption of stationarity to be able to model spatial features for the geostatistical inference. Nevertheless, this is often not a realistic assumption when dealing with nonstationary spatial data and this has motivated a variety of nonstationary spatial modeling workflows such as trend and residual decomposition, cosimulation with secondary features, and spatial segmentation and independent modeling over stationary subdomains. The advent of deep learning technologies has enabled new workflows for modeling spatial relationships. However, there is a paucity of demonstrated best practice and general guidance on mitigation of spatial nonstationarity with deep learning in the geospatial context. We demonstrate the impact of two common types of geostatistical spatial nonstationarity on deep learning model prediction performance and propose the mitigation of such impacts using self-attention (vision transformer) models. We demonstrate the utility of vision transformers for the mitigation of nonstationarity with relative errors as low as 10%, exceeding the performance of alternative deep learning methods such as convolutional neural networks. We establish best practice by demonstrating the ability of self-attention networks for modeling large-scale spatial relationships in the presence of commonly observed geospatial nonstationarity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2022.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
- 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
- 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
- 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
8 more
- 2019Axial Attention in Multidimensional Transformerscited by 350
- 2020Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic Segmentationcited by 326
- 2022V2X-ViT: Vehicle-to-Everything Cooperative Perception with Vision Transformercited by 320
- 2021Focal Self-attention for Local-Global Interactions in Vision Transformerscited by 286
- 2019A Comparative Study on Transformer vs RNN in Speech Applicationscited by 210
- 2020Rethinking Positional Encoding in Language Pre-trainingcited by 197
- 2017Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networkscited by 36
- 2019Improving Generalization of Transformer for Speech Recognition with Parallel Schedule Sampling and Relative Positional Embeddingcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.