mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Neural Correlates of Linguistic Structure Building: Comments on Kazanina & Tavano (2022)

arXiv 2212.04219 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2022cs.CL q-bio.NCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A recent perspective paper by Kazanina & Tavano (referred to as the KT perspective in the following) argues how neural oscillations cannot provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building. The view that neural oscillations can provide a potential neural correlate for syntactic structure building is largely attributed to a study by Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, and Poeppel in 2016 (referred to as the DMZTP study). The KT perspective is thought provoking, but has severe misinterpretations about the arguments in DMZTP and other studies, and contains contradictory conclusions in different parts of the perspective, making it impossible to understand the position of the authors. In the following, I summarize a few misinterpretations and inconsistent arguments in the KT perspective, and put forward a few suggestions for future studies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.

Builds on

1 of 5 references.

References · 1

  1. 2020A Structure-based Memory Maintenance Model for Neural Tracking of Linguistic Structurescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.