mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Group Generalized Mean Pooling for Vision Transformer

arXiv 2212.04114 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2022cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformer (ViT) extracts the final representation from either class token or an average of all patch tokens, following the architecture of Transformer in Natural Language Processing (NLP) or Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in computer vision. However, studies for the best way of aggregating the patch tokens are still limited to average pooling, while widely-used pooling strategies, such as max and GeM pooling, can be considered. Despite their effectiveness, the existing pooling strategies do not consider the architecture of ViT and the channel-wise difference in the activation maps, aggregating the crucial and trivial channels with the same importance. In this paper, we present Group Generalized Mean (GGeM) pooling as a simple yet powerful pooling strategy for ViT. GGeM divides the channels into groups and computes GeM pooling with a shared pooling parameter per group. As ViT groups the channels via a multi-head attention mechanism, grouping the channels by GGeM leads to lower head-wise dependence while amplifying important channels on the activation maps. Exploiting GGeM shows 0.1%p to 0.7%p performance boosts compared to the baselines and achieves state-of-the-art performance for ViT-Base and ViT-Large models in ImageNet-1K classification task. Moreover, GGeM outperforms the existing pooling strategies on image retrieval and multi-modal representation learning tasks, demonstrating the superiority of GGeM for a variety of tasks. GGeM is a simple algorithm in that only a few lines of code are necessary for implementation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.

Builds on

66 of 83 references.

References · 66

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  9. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  11. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  12. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
38 more
  1. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  2. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  3. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  6. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  7. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  9. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  10. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  11. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  12. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  13. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  14. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  15. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  16. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  17. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  18. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
  19. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  20. 2021Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentationcited by 855
  21. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  22. 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
  23. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
  24. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
  25. 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 723
  26. 2022data2vec: A General Framework for Self-supervised Learning in Speech, Vision and Languagecited by 718
  27. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  28. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  29. 2021Masked Feature Prediction for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 573
  30. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  31. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  32. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  33. 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 402
  34. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  35. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  36. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  37. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 305
  38. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.