mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoPINN: When AutoML Meets Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2212.04058 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently been proposed to solve scientific and engineering problems, where physical laws are introduced into neural networks as prior knowledge. With the embedded physical laws, PINNs enable the estimation of critical parameters, which are unobservable via physical tools, through observable variables. For example, Power Electronic Converters (PECs) are essential building blocks for the green energy transition. PINNs have been applied to estimate the capacitance, which is unobservable during PEC operations, using current and voltage, which can be observed easily during operations. The estimated capacitance facilitates self-diagnostics of PECs. Existing PINNs are often manually designed, which is time-consuming and may lead to suboptimal performance due to a large number of design choices for neural network architectures and hyperparameters. In addition, PINNs are often deployed on different physical devices, e.g., PECs, with limited and varying resources. Therefore, it requires designing different PINN models under different resource constraints, making it an even more challenging task for manual design. To contend with the challenges, we propose Automated Physics-Informed Neural Networks (AutoPINN), a framework that enables the automated design of PINNs by combining AutoML and PINNs. Specifically, we first tailor a search space that allows finding high-accuracy PINNs for PEC internal parameter estimation. We then propose a resource-aware search strategy to explore the search space to find the best PINN model under different resource constraints. We experimentally demonstrate that AutoPINN is able to find more accurate PINN models than human-designed, state-of-the-art PINN models using fewer resources.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2022.

Builds on

11 of 29 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  4. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  5. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  6. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  7. 2019PC-DARTS: Partial Channel Connections for Memory-Efficient Architecture Searchcited by 265
  8. 2019Modeling the Dynamics of PDE Systems with Physics-Constrained Deep Auto-Regressive Networkscited by 127
  9. 2019Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Power Systemscited by 80
  10. 2021AutoCTS: Automated Correlated Time Series Forecasting -- Extended Versioncited by 48
  11. 2019Achieving Conservation of Energy in Neural Network Emulators for Climate Modelingcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.