Low Variance Off-policy Evaluation with State-based Importance Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many domains, the exploration process of reinforcement learning will be too costly as it requires trying out suboptimal policies, resulting in a need for off-policy evaluation, in which a target policy is evaluated based on data collected from a known behaviour policy. In this context, importance sampling estimators provide estimates for the expected return by weighting the trajectory based on the probability ratio of the target policy and the behaviour policy. Unfortunately, such estimators have a high variance and therefore a large mean squared error. This paper proposes state-based importance sampling estimators which reduce the variance by dropping certain states from the computation of the importance weight. To illustrate their applicability, we demonstrate state-based variants of ordinary importance sampling, weighted importance sampling, per-decision importance sampling, incremental importance sampling, doubly robust off-policy evaluation, and stationary density ratio estimation. Experiments in four domains show that state-based methods consistently yield reduced variance and improved accuracy compared to their traditional counterparts.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 339
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 286
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 227
- 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
- 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 119
- 2020Asymptotically Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation for Tabular Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2018Policy Optimization via Importance Samplingcited by 47
- 2019Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Samplingcited by 37
- 2020Towards Safe Policy Improvement for Non-Stationary MDPscited by 26
- 2022Policy-Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 24
- 2019Conditional Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Learningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2026Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2024Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026ALPACA: A Reinforcement Learning Environment for Medication Repurposing and Treatment Optimization in Alzheimer's Diseasecited by 0
- 2026Smooth Multi-Policy Causal Effect Estimation in Longitudinal Settingscited by 0
- 2026Smooth Multi-Policy Causal Effect Estimation in Longitudinal Settings14 May 2026
- 2026ALPACA: A Reinforcement Learning Environment for Medication Repurposing and Treatment Optimization in Alzheimer's Disease22 Feb 2026
- 2026Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learning1 Feb 2026
- 2025Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy Evaluation28 May 2025
- 2024Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluation28 Nov 2024