mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tight Performance Guarantees of Imitator Policies with Continuous Actions

arXiv 2212.03922 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2022cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Imitation learning methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Behavioral Cloning (BC) aims at learning a policy that mimics the behavior demonstrated by an expert. The current theoretical understanding of BC is limited to the case of finite actions. In this paper, we study BC with the goal of providing theoretical guarantees on the performance of the imitator policy in the case of continuous actions. We start by deriving a novel bound on the performance gap based on Wasserstein distance, applicable for continuous-action experts, holding under the assumption that the value function is Lipschitz continuous. Since this latter condition is hardy fulfilled in practice, even for Lipschitz Markov Decision Processes and policies, we propose a relaxed setting, proving that value function is always Holder continuous. This result is of independent interest and allows obtaining in BC a general bound for the performance of the imitator policy. Finally, we analyze noise injection, a common practice in which the expert action is executed in the environment after the application of a noise kernel. We show that this practice allows deriving stronger performance guarantees, at the price of a bias due to the noise addition.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation learning methods, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2020Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and Environments22 Oct
  2. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learning16 Nov

Other references · 10

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  5. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  6. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 298
  7. 2017DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learningcited by 191
  8. 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 120
  9. 2018Lipschitz Continuity in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 91
  10. 2017Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligencecited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Pitfalls of Imitation Learning when Actions are Continuous
  2. 2023Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level Behavior
  3. 2024Stable-BC: Controlling Covariate Shift with Stable Behavior Cloning
  4. 2026Understanding Behavior Cloning with Action Quantization
  5. 2024How Generalizable Is My Behavior Cloning Policy? A Statistical Approach to Trustworthy Performance Evaluation
  6. 2024Is Behavior Cloning All You Need? Understanding Horizon in Imitation Learning
  7. 2026Behavior Cloning is Not All You Need: The Optimality of On-Policy Distillation for Noisy Expert Feedback
  8. 2026Proximal Action Replacement for Behavior Cloning Actor-Critic in Offline Reinforcement Learning