mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expressive architectures enhance interpretability of dynamics-based neural population models

arXiv 2212.03771 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2022q-bio.NC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks that can recover latent dynamics from recorded neural activity may provide a powerful avenue for identifying and interpreting the dynamical motifs underlying biological computation. Given that neural variance alone does not uniquely determine a latent dynamical system, interpretable architectures should prioritize accurate and low-dimensional latent dynamics. In this work, we evaluated the performance of sequential autoencoders (SAEs) in recovering latent chaotic attractors from simulated neural datasets. We found that SAEs with widely-used recurrent neural network (RNN)-based dynamics were unable to infer accurate firing rates at the true latent state dimensionality, and that larger RNNs relied upon dynamical features not present in the data. On the other hand, SAEs with neural ordinary differential equation (NODE)-based dynamics inferred accurate rates at the true latent state dimensionality, while also recovering latent trajectories and fixed point structure. Ablations reveal that this is mainly because NODEs (1) allow use of higher-capacity multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) to model the vector field and (2) predict the derivative rather than the next state. Decoupling the capacity of the dynamics model from its latent dimensionality enables NODEs to learn the requisite low-D dynamics where RNN cells fail. Additionally, the fact that the NODE predicts derivatives imposes a useful autoregressive prior on the latent states. The suboptimal interpretability of widely-used RNN-based dynamics may motivate substitution for alternative architectures, such as NODE, that enable learning of accurate dynamics in low-dimensional latent spaces.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.

Builds on

15 of 51 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  3. 2022Learnable latent embeddings for joint behavioral and neural analysiscited by 113
  4. 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 87
  5. 2019Universality and individuality in neural dynamics across large populations of recurrent networkscited by 61
  6. 2021Attractor and integrator networks in the braincited by 60
  7. 2022Discovering Governing Equations from Partial Measurements with Deep Delay Autoencoderscited by 58
  8. 2021Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activitycited by 57
  9. 2021Identifiable Deep Generative Models via Sparse Decodingcited by 54
  10. 2019Reverse engineering recurrent networks for sentiment classification reveals line attractor dynamicscited by 38
  11. 2016Linear dynamical neural population models through nonlinear embeddingscited by 36
  12. 2016LFADS - Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systemscited by 29
3 more
  1. 2021Interpreting neural computations by examining intrinsic and embedding dimensionality of neural activitycited by 24
  2. 2021Reverse engineering recurrent neural networks with Jacobian switching linear dynamical systemscited by 17
  3. 2021Building population models for large-scale neural recordings: opportunities and pitfallscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.