mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Capturing the Flow of Art History

arXiv 2212.03421 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.CV stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Do we really understand how machine classifies art styles? Historically, art is perceived and interpreted by human eyes and there are always controversial discussions over how people identify and understand art. Historians and general public tend to interpret the subject matter of art through the context of history and social factors. Style, however, is different from subject matter. Given the fact that Style does not correspond to the existence of certain objects in the painting and is mainly related to the form and can be correlated with features at different levels.(Ahmed Elgammal et al. 2018), which makes the identification and classification of the characteristics artwork's style and the "transition" - how it flows and evolves - remains as a challenge for both human and machine. In this work, a series of state-of-art neural networks and manifold learning algorithms are explored to unveil this intriguing topic: How does machine capture and interpret the flow of Art History?

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.

Builds on

6 of 18 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  5. 2018The Shape of Art History in the Eyes of the Machinecited by 33
  6. 2020Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy: FixEfficientNetcited by 31

Built on by

Not cited yet.