Interpretation of Neural Networks is Susceptible to Universal Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpreting neural network classifiers using gradient-based saliency maps has been extensively studied in the deep learning literature. While the existing algorithms manage to achieve satisfactory performance in application to standard image recognition datasets, recent works demonstrate the vulnerability of widely-used gradient-based interpretation schemes to norm-bounded perturbations adversarially designed for every individual input sample. However, such adversarial perturbations are commonly designed using the knowledge of an input sample, and hence perform sub-optimally in application to an unknown or constantly changing data point. In this paper, we show the existence of a Universal Perturbation for Interpretation (UPI) for standard image datasets, which can alter a gradient-based feature map of neural networks over a significant fraction of test samples. To design such a UPI, we propose a gradient-based optimization method as well as a principal component analysis (PCA)-based approach to compute a UPI which can effectively alter a neural network's gradient-based interpretation on different samples. We support the proposed UPI approaches by presenting several numerical results of their successful applications to standard image datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2022.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,137
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,836
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,360
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 782
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
- 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
- 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 86
- 2017Art of singular vectors and universal adversarial perturbationscited by 49
- 2020Real-time, Universal, and Robust Adversarial Attacks Against Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Robust Decentralized Learning with Local Updates and Gradient Trackingcited by 8
- 2024Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizabilitycited by 3
- 2024Attack on Scene Flow using Point Cloudscited by 1
- 2026On the Fragility of AI-Based Channel Decoders under Small Channel Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of AI-Based Channel Decoders under Small Channel Perturbations2 Feb 2026
- 2024Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability15 Aug 2024
- 2024Robust Decentralized Learning with Local Updates and Gradient Tracking2 May 2024
- 2024Attack on Scene Flow using Point Clouds21 Apr 2024