Rethinking Generative Methods for Image Restoration in Physics-based Vision: A Theoretical Analysis from the Perspective of Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
End-to-end generative methods are considered a more promising solution for image restoration in physics-based vision compared with the traditional deconstructive methods based on handcrafted composition models. However, existing generative methods still have plenty of room for improvement in quantitative performance. More crucially, these methods are considered black boxes due to weak interpretability and there is rarely a theory trying to explain their mechanism and learning process. In this study, we try to re-interpret these generative methods for image restoration tasks using information theory. Different from conventional understanding, we analyzed the information flow of these methods and identified three sources of information (extracted high-level information, retained low-level information, and external information that is absent from the source inputs) are involved and optimized respectively in generating the restoration results. We further derived their learning behaviors, optimization objectives, and the corresponding information boundaries by extending the information bottleneck principle. Based on this theoretic framework, we found that many existing generative methods tend to be direct applications of the general models designed for conventional generation tasks, which may suffer from problems including over-invested abstraction processes, inherent details loss, and vanishing gradients or imbalance in training. We analyzed these issues with both intuitive and theoretical explanations and proved them with empirical evidence respectively. Ultimately, we proposed general solutions or ideas to address the above issue and validated these approaches with performance boosts on six datasets of three different image restoration tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.
Builds on
39 of 80 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
- 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
- 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,001
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
- 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 860
27 more
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2017Benchmarking Single Image Dehazing and Beyondcited by 447
- 2015Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 365
- 2016Deep Joint Rain Detection and Removal from a Single Imagecited by 352
- 2016DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removalcited by 314
- 2021Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Modelscited by 252
- 2018Density-aware Single Image De-raining using a Multi-stream Dense Networkcited by 248
- 2018Recurrent Squeeze-and-Excitation Context Aggregation Net for Single Image Derainingcited by 205
- 2017Attentive Generative Adversarial Network for Raindrop Removal from a Single Imagecited by 204
- 2017Image De-raining Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 197
- 2019Heavy Rain Image Restoration: Integrating Physics Model and Conditional Adversarial Learningcited by 157
- 2019Deep Learning on Image Denoising: An overviewcited by 128
- 2013Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative Modelscited by 113
- 2021An Introduction to Deep Generative Modelingcited by 104
- 2018Cycle-Dehaze: Enhanced CycleGAN for Single Image Dehazingcited by 79
- 2019Single Image Deraining: From Model-Based to Data-Driven and Beyondcited by 77
- 2018Lightweight Pyramid Networks for Image Derainingcited by 64
- 2017Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resizecited by 37
- 2018Physics-Based Generative Adversarial Models for Image Restoration and Beyondcited by 37
- 2019Unsupervised Domain-Specific Deblurring via Disentangled Representationscited by 37
- 2020Conditional Variational Image Derainingcited by 22
- 2018Attention-based Adaptive Selection of Operations for Image Restoration in the Presence of Unknown Combined Distortionscited by 18
- 2019DRD-Net: Detail-recovery Image Deraining via Context Aggregation Networkscited by 15
- 2019Blind Denoising Autoencodercited by 13
- 2019Gradual Network for Single Image De-rainingcited by 10
- 2020LCA-Net: Light Convolutional Autoencoder for Image Dehazingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.