Adaptive Configuration for Heterogeneous Participants in Decentralized Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data generated at the network edge can be processed locally by leveraging the paradigm of edge computing (EC). Aided by EC, decentralized federated learning (DFL), which overcomes the single-point-of-failure problem in the parameter server (PS) based federated learning, is becoming a practical and popular approach for machine learning over distributed data. However, DFL faces two critical challenges, ie, system heterogeneity and statistical heterogeneity introduced by edge devices. To ensure fast convergence with the existence of slow edge devices, we present an efficient DFL method, termed FedHP, which integrates adaptive control of both local updating frequency and network topology to better support the heterogeneous participants. We establish a theoretical relationship between local updating frequency and network topology regarding model training performance and obtain a convergence upper bound. Upon this, we propose an optimization algorithm, that adaptively determines local updating frequencies and constructs the network topology, so as to speed up convergence and improve the model accuracy. Evaluation results show that the proposed FedHP can reduce the completion time by about 51% and improve model accuracy by at least 5% in heterogeneous scenarios, compared with the baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024SatFed: A Resource-Efficient LEO Satellite-Assisted Heterogeneous Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 21
- 2023MergeSFL: Split Federated Learning with Feature Merging and Batch Size Regulationcited by 13
- 2023Federated Learning While Providing Model as a Service: Joint Training and Inference Optimizationcited by 8
- 2024Fair Concurrent Training of Multiple Models in Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2024Does Worst-Performing Agent Lead the Pack? Analyzing Agent Dynamics in Unified Distributed SGDcited by 2
- 2025A Semi-Supervised Federated Learning Framework with Hierarchical Clustering Aggregation for Heterogeneous Satellite Networkscited by 1
- 2023SemiSFL: Split Federated Learning on Unlabeled and Non-IID Datacited by 0
- 2023Secure Decentralized Learning with Blockchaincited by 0
- 2024Heterogeneity-Aware Resource Allocation and Topology Design for Hierarchical Federated Edge Learningcited by 0
- 2025How to Evaluate Participant Contributions in Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Asynchronous Decentralized Federated Learning over Lossy Wireless Links via Reception- and Age-Aware Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Asynchronous Decentralized Federated Learning over Lossy Wireless Links via Reception- and Age-Aware Aggregation9 Jun 2026
- 2025A Semi-Supervised Federated Learning Framework with Hierarchical Clustering Aggregation for Heterogeneous Satellite Networks30 Jul 2025
- 2025How to Evaluate Participant Contributions in Decentralized Federated Learning29 May 2025
- 2024Heterogeneity-Aware Resource Allocation and Topology Design for Hierarchical Federated Edge Learning29 Sep 2024
- 2024Does Worst-Performing Agent Lead the Pack? Analyzing Agent Dynamics in Unified Distributed SGD26 Sep 2024
- 2024SatFed: A Resource-Efficient LEO Satellite-Assisted Heterogeneous Federated Learning Framework20 Sep 2024
- 2024Fair Concurrent Training of Multiple Models in Federated Learning22 Apr 2024
- 2023Federated Learning While Providing Model as a Service: Joint Training and Inference Optimization20 Dec 2023
- 2023MergeSFL: Split Federated Learning with Feature Merging and Batch Size Regulation22 Nov 2023
- 2023Secure Decentralized Learning with Blockchain10 Oct 2023
- 2023SemiSFL: Split Federated Learning on Unlabeled and Non-IID Data29 Jul 2023