mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Acceleration AI Ethics, the Debate between Innovation and Safety, and Stability AI's Diffusion versus OpenAI's Dall-E

arXiv 2212.01834 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2022cs.CY cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One objection to conventional AI ethics is that it slows innovation. This presentation responds by reconfiguring ethics as an innovation accelerator. The critical elements develop from a contrast between Stability AI's Diffusion and OpenAI's Dall-E. By analyzing the divergent values underlying their opposed strategies for development and deployment, five conceptions are identified as common to acceleration ethics. Uncertainty is understood as positive and encouraging, rather than discouraging. Innovation is conceived as intrinsically valuable, instead of worthwhile only as mediated by social effects. AI problems are solved by more AI, not less. Permissions and restrictions governing AI emerge from a decentralized process, instead of a unified authority. The work of ethics is embedded in AI development and application, instead of functioning from outside. Together, these attitudes and practices remake ethics as provoking rather than restraining artificial intelligence.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2022.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

5 papers.