Differentially-Private Data Synthetisation for Efficient Re-Identification Risk Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Protecting user data privacy can be achieved via many methods, from statistical transformations to generative models. However, all of them have critical drawbacks. For example, creating a transformed data set using traditional techniques is highly time-consuming. Also, recent deep learning-based solutions require significant computational resources in addition to long training phases, and differentially private-based solutions may undermine data utility. In this paper, we propose ε-PrivateSMOTE, a technique designed for safeguarding against re-identification and linkage attacks, particularly addressing cases with a high sloppy re-identification risk. Our proposal combines synthetic data generation via noise-induced interpolation with differential privacy principles to obfuscate high-risk cases. We demonstrate how ε-PrivateSMOTE is capable of achieving competitive results in privacy risk and better predictive performance when compared to multiple traditional and state-of-the-art privacy-preservation methods, including generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, and differential privacy baselines. We also show how our method improves time requirements by at least a factor of 9 and is a resource-efficient solution that ensures high performance without specialised hardware.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.
Builds on
12 of 60 references.
References · 12
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
- 2020DP-CGAN: Differentially Private Synthetic Data and Label Generationcited by 118
- 2019Synthetic Data for Deep Learningcited by 113
- 2020Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Daycited by 105
- 2016Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysiscited by 92
- 2022A Unified Framework for Quantifying Privacy Risk in Synthetic Datacited by 45
- 2017Towards Measuring Membership Privacycited by 27
- 2022dpart: Differentially Private Autoregressive Tabular, a General Framework for Synthetic Data Generationcited by 12
- 2020Reducing the Computational Cost of Deep Generative Models with Binary Neural Networkscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026SoK: Challenges in Tabular Membership Inference Attackscited by 1
- 2024Automated Privacy-Preserving Techniques via Meta-Learningcited by 0
- 2024Class-Aware Contrastive Optimization for Imbalanced Text Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Risk-Equalized Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Protecting Outliers by Controlling Record-Level Influencecited by 0
- 2026Risk-Equalized Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Protecting Outliers by Controlling Record-Level Influence10 Feb 2026
- 2026SoK: Challenges in Tabular Membership Inference Attacks22 Jan 2026
- 2024Class-Aware Contrastive Optimization for Imbalanced Text Classification29 Oct 2024
- 2024Automated Privacy-Preserving Techniques via Meta-Learning24 Jun 2024