Explaining automated gender classification of human gait
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models are highly effective in classifying gait analysis data, however, they lack in providing explanations for their predictions. This "black-box" characteristic makes it impossible to understand on which input patterns, ML models base their predictions. The present study investigates whether Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods, i.e., Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), can be useful to enhance the explainability of ML predictions in gait classification. The research question was: Which input patterns are most relevant for an automated gender classification model and do they correspond to characteristics identified in the literature? We utilized a subset of the GAITREC dataset containing five bilateral ground reaction force (GRF) recordings per person during barefoot walking of 62 healthy participants: 34 females and 28 males. Each input signal (right and left side) was min-max normalized before concatenation and fed into a multi-layer Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The classification accuracy was obtained over a stratified ten-fold cross-validation. To identify gender-specific patterns, the input relevance scores were derived using LRP. The mean classification accuracy of the CNN with 83.3% showed a clear superiority over the zero-rule baseline of 54.8%.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2022.
Builds on
0 of 9 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.