mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Will My Robot Achieve My Goals? Predicting the Probability that an MDP Policy Reaches a User-Specified Behavior Target

arXiv 2211.16462 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.LG stat.ME stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As an autonomous system performs a task, it should maintain a calibrated estimate of the probability that it will achieve the user's goal. If that probability falls below some desired level, it should alert the user so that appropriate interventions can be made. This paper considers settings where the user's goal is specified as a target interval for a real-valued performance summary, such as the cumulative reward, measured at a fixed horizon H. At each time t ∈ 0, ldots, H-1, our method produces a calibrated estimate of the probability that the final cumulative reward will fall within a user-specified target interval [y^-,y^+]. Using this estimate, the autonomous system can raise an alarm if the probability drops below a specified threshold. We compute the probability estimates by inverting conformal prediction. Our starting point is the Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR) method of Romano et al., which applies split-conformal prediction to the results of quantile regression. CQR is not invertible, but by using the conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) as the non-conformity measure, we show how to obtain an invertible modification that we call Probability-space Conformalized Quantile Regression (PCQR). Like CQR, PCQR produces well-calibrated conditional prediction intervals with finite-sample marginal guarantees. By inverting PCQR, we obtain guarantees for the probability that the cumulative reward of an autonomous system will fall below a threshold sampled from the marginal distribution of the response variable (i.e., a calibrated CDF estimate) that we employ to predict coverage probabilities for user-specified target intervals. Experiments on two domains confirm that these probabilities are well-calibrated.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

5 of 17 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  2. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 369
  3. 2017StarCraft II: A New Challenge for Reinforcement Learningcited by 274
  4. 2016Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action Segmentationcited by 199
  5. 2022Conformal Prediction Intervals for Markov Decision Process Trajectoriescited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.