mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising

arXiv 2211.16251 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical utility maximizer model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called value maximizer, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of 2 on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least frac54 that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.