mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of Training Object Detection Models with Synthetic Data

arXiv 2211.16066 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the use of synthetic training data has been on the rise as it offers correctly labelled datasets at a lower cost. The downside of this technique is that the so-called domain gap between the real target images and synthetic training data leads to a decrease in performance. In this paper, we attempt to provide a holistic overview of how to use synthetic data for object detection. We analyse aspects of generating the data as well as techniques used to train the models. We do so by devising a number of experiments, training models on the Dataset of Industrial Metal Objects (DIMO). This dataset contains both real and synthetic images. The synthetic part has different subsets that are either exact synthetic copies of the real data or are copies with certain aspects randomised. This allows us to analyse what types of variation are good for synthetic training data and which aspects should be modelled to closely match the target data. Furthermore, we investigate what types of training techniques are beneficial towards generalisation to real data, and how to use them. Additionally, we analyse how real images can be leveraged when training on synthetic images. All these experiments are validated on real data and benchmarked to models trained on real data. The results offer a number of interesting takeaways that can serve as basic guidelines for using synthetic data for object detection. Code to reproduce results is available at https://github.com/EDM-Research/DIMO_ObjectDetection.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

16 of 20 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  4. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  5. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  6. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
  7. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
  8. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  9. 2016Virtual Worlds as Proxy for Multi-Object Tracking Analysiscited by 340
  10. 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 292
  11. 2015A Deeper Look at Dataset Biascited by 86
  12. 2019Photorealistic Image Synthesis for Object Instance Detectioncited by 66
4 more
  1. 2017On Pre-Trained Image Features and Synthetic Images for Deep Learningcited by 51
  2. 2019How much real data do we actually need: Analyzing object detection performance using synthetic and real datacited by 29
  3. 2016How useful is photo-realistic rendering for visual learning?cited by 22
  4. 2022Dataset of Industrial Metal Objectscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

9 papers.