mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Effective Utilisation of Multiple Open-Source Datasets to Improve Generalisation Performance of Point Cloud Segmentation Models

arXiv 2211.15877 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic segmentation of aerial point cloud data can be utilised to differentiate which points belong to classes such as ground, buildings, or vegetation. Point clouds generated from aerial sensors mounted to drones or planes can utilise LIDAR sensors or cameras along with photogrammetry. Each method of data collection contains unique characteristics which can be learnt independently with state-of-the-art point cloud segmentation models. Utilising a single point cloud segmentation model can be desirable in situations where point cloud sensors, quality, and structures can change. In these situations it is desirable that the segmentation model can handle these variations with predictable and consistent results. Although deep learning can segment point clouds accurately it often suffers in generalisation, adapting poorly to data which is different than the training data. To address this issue, we propose to utilise multiple available open source fully annotated datasets to train and test models that are better able to generalise. In this paper we discuss the combination of these datasets into a simple training set and challenging test set. Combining datasets allows us to evaluate generalisation performance on known variations in the point cloud data. We show that a naive combination of datasets produces a model with improved generalisation performance as expected. We go on to show that an improved sampling strategy which decreases sampling variations increases the generalisation performance substantially on top of this. Experiments to find which sample variations give this performance boost found that consistent densities are the most important.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  3. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  4. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
  5. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  6. 2018PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Pointscited by 764
  7. 2019RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Cloudscited by 585
  8. 2019Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Surveycited by 558
  9. 2017Large-scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Graphscited by 385
  10. 2019ShellNet: Efficient Point Cloud Convolutional Neural Networks using Concentric Shells Statisticscited by 104
  11. 2020Towards Semantic Segmentation of Urban-Scale 3D Point Clouds: A Dataset, Benchmarks and Challengescited by 80
  12. 2018Monte Carlo Convolution for Learning on Non-Uniformly Sampled Point Cloudscited by 62
7 more
  1. 2019ConvPoint: Continuous Convolutions for Point Cloud Processingcited by 62
  2. 2022ProposalContrast: Unsupervised Pre-training for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 43
  3. 2019Point Cloud Oversegmentation with Graph-Structured Deep Metric Learningcited by 42
  4. 2021The Hessigheim 3D (H3D) Benchmark on Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution 3D Point Clouds and Textured Meshes from UAV LiDAR and Multi-View-Stereocited by 37
  5. 2019DublinCity: Annotated LiDAR Point Cloud and its Applicationscited by 31
  6. 2021SUM: A Benchmark Dataset of Semantic Urban Meshescited by 23
  7. 2020Semantic Segmentation on Swiss3DCities: A Benchmark Study on Aerial Photogrammetric 3D Pointcloud Datasetcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.