Latent SHAP: Toward Practical Human-Interpretable Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model agnostic feature attribution algorithms (such as SHAP and LIME) are ubiquitous techniques for explaining the decisions of complex classification models, such as deep neural networks. However, since complex classification models produce superior performance when trained on low-level (or encoded) features, in many cases, the explanations generated by these algorithms are neither interpretable nor usable by humans. Methods proposed in recent studies that support the generation of human-interpretable explanations are impractical, because they require a fully invertible transformation function that maps the model's input features to the human-interpretable features. In this work, we introduce Latent SHAP, a black-box feature attribution framework that provides human-interpretable explanations, without the requirement for a fully invertible transformation function. We demonstrate Latent SHAP's effectiveness using (1) a controlled experiment where invertible transformation functions are available, which enables robust quantitative evaluation of our method, and (2) celebrity attractiveness classification (using the CelebA dataset) where invertible transformation functions are not available, which enables thorough qualitative evaluation of our method.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2022.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
- 2017Interpretable Learning for Self-Driving Cars by Visualizing Causal Attentioncited by 107
- 2020Human-interpretable model explainability on high-dimensional datacited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023SurvBeX: An explanation method of the machine learning survival models based on the Beran estimatorcited by 3
- 2023SurvBeNIM: The Beran-Based Neural Importance Model for Explaining the Survival Modelscited by 0
- 2024Perturbation on Feature Coalition: Towards Interpretable Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2024Perturbation on Feature Coalition: Towards Interpretable Deep Neural Networks23 Aug 2024
- 2023SurvBeNIM: The Beran-Based Neural Importance Model for Explaining the Survival Models11 Dec 2023
- 2023SurvBeX: An explanation method of the machine learning survival models based on the Beran estimator7 Aug 2023