An Ensemble-Based Deep Framework for Estimating Thermo-Chemical State Variables from Flamelet Generated Manifolds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complete computation of turbulent combustion flow involves two separate steps: mapping reaction kinetics to low-dimensional manifolds and looking-up this approximate manifold during CFD run-time to estimate the thermo-chemical state variables. In our previous work, we showed that using a deep architecture to learn the two steps jointly, instead of separately, is 73% more accurate at estimating the source energy, a key state variable, compared to benchmarks and can be integrated within a DNS turbulent combustion framework. In their natural form, such deep architectures do not allow for uncertainty quantification of the quantities of interest: the source energy and key species source terms. In this paper, we expand on such architectures, specifically ChemTab, by introducing deep ensembles to approximate the posterior distribution of the quantities of interest. We investigate two strategies of creating these ensemble models: one that keeps the flamelet origin information (Flamelets strategy) and one that ignores the origin and considers all the data independently (Points strategy). To train these models we used flamelet data generated by the GRI--Mech 3.0 methane mechanism, which consists of 53 chemical species and 325 reactions. Our results demonstrate that the Flamelets strategy is superior in terms of the absolute prediction error for the quantities of interest, but is reliant on the types of flamelets used to train the ensemble. The Points strategy is best at capturing the variability of the quantities of interest, independent of the flamelet types. We conclude that, overall, ChemTab Deep Ensembles allows for a more accurate representation of the source energy and key species source terms, compared to the model without these modifications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2019Challenges in Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian neural networkscited by 44
- 2021Measurement of Hybrid Rocket Solid Fuel Regression Rate for a Slab Burner using Deep Learningcited by 4
- 2022ChemTab: A Physics Guided Chemistry Modeling Frameworkcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.