LU decomposition and Toeplitz decomposition of a neural network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is well-known that any matrix A has an LU decomposition. Less well-known is the fact that it has a 'Toeplitz decomposition' A = T1 T2 cdots Tr where Ti's are Toeplitz matrices. We will prove that any continuous function f : ℝn → ℝm has an approximation to arbitrary accuracy by a neural network that takes the form L1 σ1 U1 σ2 L2 σ3 U2 cdots Lr σ2r-1 Ur, i.e., where the weight matrices alternate between lower and upper triangular matrices, σi(x) := σ(x - bi) for some bias vector bi, and the activation σ may be chosen to be essentially any uniformly continuous nonpolynomial function. The same result also holds with Toeplitz matrices, i.e., f ≈ T1 σ1 T2 σ2 cdots σr-1 Tr to arbitrary accuracy, and likewise for Hankel matrices. A consequence of our Toeplitz result is a fixed-width universal approximation theorem for convolutional neural networks, which so far have only arbitrary width versions. Since our results apply in particular to the case when f is a general neural network, we may regard them as LU and Toeplitz decompositions of a neural network. The practical implication of our results is that one may vastly reduce the number of weight parameters in a neural network without sacrificing its power of universal approximation. We will present several experiments on real data sets to show that imposing such structures on the weight matrices sharply reduces the number of training parameters with almost no noticeable effect on test accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
- 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 320
- 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 250
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2019Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networkscited by 200
- 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 183
- 2018Universality of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
- 20191D Convolutional Neural Networks and Applications: A Surveycited by 153
6 more
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 122
- 2019One ticket to win them all: generalizing lottery ticket initializations across datasets and optimizerscited by 102
- 2020Minimum Width for Universal Approximationcited by 94
- 2018ResNet with one-neuron hidden layers is a Universal Approximatorcited by 79
- 2018Small ReLU networks are powerful memorizers: a tight analysis of memorization capacitycited by 78
- 2018Deep, Skinny Neural Networks are not Universal Approximatorscited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.