mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Meta-Learning for Automated Selection of Anomaly Detectors for Semi-Supervised Datasets

arXiv 2211.13681 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In anomaly detection, a prominent task is to induce a model to identify anomalies learned solely based on normal data. Generally, one is interested in finding an anomaly detector that correctly identifies anomalies, i.e., data points that do not belong to the normal class, without raising too many false alarms. Which anomaly detector is best suited depends on the dataset at hand and thus needs to be tailored. The quality of an anomaly detector may be assessed via confusion-based metrics such as the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). However, since during training only normal data is available in a semi-supervised setting, such metrics are not accessible. To facilitate automated machine learning for anomaly detectors, we propose to employ meta-learning to predict MCC scores based on metrics that can be computed with normal data only. First promising results can be obtained considering the hypervolume and the false positive rate as meta-features.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2022.

Builds on

6 of 26 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutionscited by 253
  2. 2019PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detectioncited by 221
  3. 2020TODS: An Automated Time Series Outlier Detection Systemcited by 41
  4. 2018LSCP: Locally Selective Combination in Parallel Outlier Ensemblescited by 31
  5. 2020PyODDS: An End-to-end Outlier Detection System with Automated Machine Learningcited by 21
  6. 2022Online AutoML: An adaptive AutoML framework for online learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.