mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chinese Character Recognition with Radical-Structured Stroke Trees

arXiv 2211.13518 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The flourishing blossom of deep learning has witnessed the rapid development of Chinese character recognition. However, it remains a great challenge that the characters for testing may have different distributions from those of the training dataset. Existing methods based on a single-level representation (character-level, radical-level, or stroke-level) may be either too sensitive to distribution changes (e.g., induced by blurring, occlusion, and zero-shot problems) or too tolerant to one-to-many ambiguities. In this paper, we represent each Chinese character as a stroke tree, which is organized according to its radical structures, to fully exploit the merits of both radical and stroke levels in a decent way. We propose a two-stage decomposition framework, where a Feature-to-Radical Decoder perceives radical structures and radical regions, and a Radical-to-Stroke Decoder further predicts the stroke sequences according to the features of radical regions. The generated radical structures and stroke sequences are encoded as a Radical-Structured Stroke Tree (RSST), which is fed to a Tree-to-Character Translator based on the proposed Weighted Edit Distance to match the closest candidate character in the RSST lexicon. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art single-level methods by increasing margins as the distribution difference becomes more severe in the blurring, occlusion, and zero-shot scenarios, which indeed validates the robustness of the proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2022.

Builds on

14 of 41 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  5. 2021Benchmarking Chinese Text Recognition: Datasets, Baselines, and an Empirical Studycited by 53
  6. 2021Zero-Shot Chinese Character Recognition with Stroke-Level Decompositioncited by 26
  7. 2018DenseRAN for Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognitioncited by 24
  8. 2016Online and Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition: A Comprehensive Study and New Benchmarkcited by 17
  9. 2013Multi-Column Deep Neural Networks for Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Classificationcited by 15
  10. 2017Building Fast and Compact Convolutional Neural Networks for Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognitioncited by 14
  11. 2015High Performance Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition Using GoogLeNet and Directional Feature Mapscited by 10
  12. 2019Template-Instance Loss for Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognitioncited by 9
2 more
  1. 2018Building Efficient CNN Architecture for Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognitioncited by 5
  2. 2022Stroke-Based Autoencoders: Self-Supervised Learners for Efficient Zero-Shot Chinese Character Recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

12 papers.