mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the impact of incorporating task-information in learning-based image denoising

arXiv 2211.13303 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022eess.IV eess.SPcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A variety of deep neural network (DNN)-based image denoising methods have been proposed for use with medical images. These methods are typically trained by minimizing loss functions that quantify a distance between the denoised image, or a transformed version of it, and the defined target image (e.g., a noise-free or low-noise image). They have demonstrated high performance in terms of traditional image quality metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), or peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). However, it has been reported recently that such denoising methods may not always improve objective measures of image quality. In this work, a task-informed DNN-based image denoising method was established and systematically evaluated. A transfer learning approach was employed, in which the DNN is first pre-trained by use of a conventional (non-task-informed) loss function and subsequently fine-tuned by use of the hybrid loss that includes a task-component. The task-component was designed to measure the performance of a numerical observer (NO) on a signal detection task. The impact of network depth and constraining the fine-tuning to specific layers of the DNN was explored. The task-informed training method was investigated in a stylized low-dose X-ray computed tomography (CT) denoising study for which binary signal detection tasks under signal-known-statistically (SKS) with background-known-statistically (BKS) conditions were considered. The impact of changing the specified task at inference time to be different from that employed for model training, a phenomenon we refer to as "task-shift", was also investigated. The presented results indicate that the task-informed training method can improve observer performance while providing control over the trade off between traditional and task-based measures of image quality.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.