Neural Superstatistics for Bayesian Estimation of Dynamic Cognitive Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mathematical models of cognition are often memoryless and ignore potential fluctuations of their parameters. However, human cognition is inherently dynamic. Thus, we propose to augment mechanistic cognitive models with a temporal dimension and estimate the resulting dynamics from a superstatistics perspective. Such a model entails a hierarchy between a low-level observation model and a high-level transition model. The observation model describes the local behavior of a system, and the transition model specifies how the parameters of the observation model evolve over time. To overcome the estimation challenges resulting from the complexity of superstatistical models, we develop and validate a simulation-based deep learning method for Bayesian inference, which can recover both time-varying and time-invariant parameters. We first benchmark our method against two existing frameworks capable of estimating time-varying parameters. We then apply our method to fit a dynamic version of the diffusion decision model to long time series of human response times data. Our results show that the deep learning approach is very efficient in capturing the temporal dynamics of the model. Furthermore, we show that the erroneous assumption of static or homogeneous parameters will hide important temporal information.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.
Builds on
15 of 73 references.
References · 15
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
- 2019Automatic Posterior Transformation for Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 216
- 2019Guided Image Generation with Conditional Invertible Neural Networkscited by 147
- 2020BayesFlow: Learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networkscited by 139
- 2018Validating Bayesian Inference Algorithms with Simulation-Based Calibrationcited by 118
- 2021Graphical Test for Discrete Uniformity and its Applications in Goodness of Fit Evaluation and Multiple Sample Comparisoncited by 26
- 2020Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learningcited by 22
- 2019Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive sciencecited by 16
- 2022Some models are useful, but how do we know which ones? Towards a unified Bayesian model taxonomycited by 16
3 more
- 2019Approximate leave-future-out cross-validation for Bayesian time series modelscited by 10
- 2022Meta-Uncertainty in Bayesian Model Comparisoncited by 5
- 2018Calibrating Model-Based Inferences and Decisionscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023BayesFlow: Amortized Bayesian Workflows With Neural Networkscited by 32
- 2025Amortized Bayesian Mixture Modelscited by 3
- 2024Sample-efficient neural likelihood-free Bayesian inference of implicit HMMscited by 1
- 2024Latent Variable Sequence Identification for Cognitive Models with Neural Network Estimatorscited by 0
- 2026High-Dimensional Simulation-Based Inference in Latent Spacescited by 0
- 2026High-Dimensional Simulation-Based Inference in Latent Spaces29 Sep 2026
- 2025Amortized Bayesian Mixture Models17 Jan 2025
- 2024Latent Variable Sequence Identification for Cognitive Models with Neural Network Estimators20 Jun 2024
- 2024Sample-efficient neural likelihood-free Bayesian inference of implicit HMMs2 May 2024
- 2023BayesFlow: Amortized Bayesian Workflows With Neural Networks28 Jun 2023