Ontology-aware Learning and Evaluation for Audio Tagging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study defines a new evaluation metric for audio tagging tasks to overcome the limitation of the conventional mean average precision (mAP) metric, which treats different kinds of sound as independent classes without considering their relations. Also, due to the ambiguities in sound labeling, the labels in the training and evaluation set are not guaranteed to be accurate and exhaustive, which poses challenges for robust evaluation with mAP. The proposed metric, ontology-aware mean average precision (OmAP) addresses the weaknesses of mAP by utilizing the AudioSet ontology information during the evaluation. Specifically, we reweight the false positive events in the model prediction based on the ontology graph distance to the target classes. The OmAP measure also provides more insights into model performance by evaluations with different coarse-grained levels in the ontology graph. We conduct human evaluations and demonstrate that OmAP is more consistent with human perception than mAP. To further verify the importance of utilizing the ontology information, we also propose a novel loss function (OBCE) that reweights binary cross entropy (BCE) loss based on the ontology distance. Our experiment shows that OBCE can improve both mAP and OmAP metrics on the AudioSet tagging task.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2022.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 643
- 2019PANNs: Large-Scale Pretrained Audio Neural Networks for Audio Pattern Recognitioncited by 574
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
- 2020FSD50K: An Open Dataset of Human-Labeled Sound Eventscited by 342
- 2022HTS-AT: A Hierarchical Token-Semantic Audio Transformer for Sound Classification and Detectioncited by 176
- 2022NaturalSpeech: End-to-End Text to Speech Synthesis with Human-Level Qualitycited by 152
- 2021PSLA: Improving Audio Tagging with Pretraining, Sampling, Labeling, and Aggregationcited by 82
- 2022Simple Pooling Front-ends For Efficient Audio Classificationcited by 9
- 2016A Joint Detection-Classification Model for Audio Tagging of Weakly Labelled Datacited by 4
- 2022Learning Temporal Resolution in Spectrogram for Audio Classificationcited by 4
- 2022Segment-level Metric Learning for Few-shot Bioacoustic Event Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023AudioLDM: Text-to-Audio Generation with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 599