mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How to Describe Images in a More Funny Way? Towards a Modular Approach to Cross-Modal Sarcasm Generation

arXiv 2211.10992 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sarcasm generation has been investigated in previous studies by considering it as a text-to-text generation problem, i.e., generating a sarcastic sentence for an input sentence. In this paper, we study a new problem of cross-modal sarcasm generation (CMSG), i.e., generating a sarcastic description for a given image. CMSG is challenging as models need to satisfy the characteristics of sarcasm, as well as the correlation between different modalities. In addition, there should be some inconsistency between the two modalities, which requires imagination. Moreover, high-quality training data is insufficient. To address these problems, we take a step toward generating sarcastic descriptions from images without paired training data and propose an Extraction-Generation-Ranking based Modular method (EGRM) for cross-model sarcasm generation. Specifically, EGRM first extracts diverse information from an image at different levels and uses the obtained image tags, sentimental descriptive caption, and commonsense-based consequence to generate candidate sarcastic texts. Then, a comprehensive ranking algorithm, which considers image-text relation, sarcasticness, and grammaticality, is proposed to select a final text from the candidate texts. Human evaluation at five criteria on a total of 1200 generated image-text pairs from eight systems and auxiliary automatic evaluation show the superiority of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2022.

Builds on

42 of 67 references.

References · 42

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  6. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  7. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  8. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  9. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  10. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  11. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  12. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
30 more
  1. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  2. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
  3. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
  4. 2019COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 450
  5. 2019Meshed-Memory Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 343
  6. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 302
  7. 2016Image Captioning with Semantic Attentioncited by 260
  8. 2018Auto-Encoding Scene Graphs for Image Captioningcited by 254
  9. 2016Knowing When to Look: Adaptive Attention via A Visual Sentinel for Image Captioningcited by 231
  10. 2018Exploring Visual Relationship for Image Captioningcited by 215
  11. 2020X-Linear Attention Networks for Image Captioningcited by 198
  12. 2020Improving Image Captioning with Better Use of Captionscited by 84
  13. 2016Boosting Image Captioning with Attributescited by 76
  14. 2021Dual-Level Collaborative Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 71
  15. 2017Towards Diverse and Natural Image Descriptions via a Conditional GANcited by 59
  16. 2017Contrastive Learning for Image Captioningcited by 54
  17. 2015SentiCap: Generating Image Descriptions with Sentimentscited by 48
  18. 2020Improving Image Captioning by Leveraging Intra- and Inter-layer Global Representation in Transformer Networkcited by 48
  19. 2020R3: Reverse, Retrieve, and Rank for Sarcasm Generation with Commonsense Knowledgecited by 32
  20. 2015What value do explicit high level concepts have in vision to language problems?cited by 31
  21. 2021Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BARTcited by 24
  22. 2016Areas of Attention for Image Captioningcited by 23
  23. 2017Sarcasm SIGN: Interpreting Sarcasm with Sentiment Based Monolingual Machine Translationcited by 18
  24. 2017The Role of Conversation Context for Sarcasm Detection in Online Interactionscited by 16
  25. 2018Image Captioning at Will: A Versatile Scheme for Effectively Injecting Sentiments into Image Descriptionscited by 12
  26. 2018Context-Aware Visual Policy Network for Sequence-Level Image Captioningcited by 12
  27. 2022Rethinking the Reference-based Distinctive Image Captioningcited by 8
  28. 2018Senti-Attend: Image Captioning using Sentiment and Attentioncited by 5
  29. 2019A Neural Approach to Irony Generationcited by 5
  30. 2021Geometry Attention Transformer with Position-aware LSTMs for Image Captioningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.