mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Debiasing Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learning by Learning the Outer Value Function

arXiv 2211.10550 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Meta-gradient Reinforcement Learning (RL) allows agents to self-tune their hyper-parameters in an online fashion during training. In this paper, we identify a bias in the meta-gradient of current meta-gradient RL approaches. This bias comes from using the critic that is trained using the meta-learned discount factor for the advantage estimation in the outer objective which requires a different discount factor. Because the meta-learned discount factor is typically lower than the one used in the outer objective, the resulting bias can cause the meta-gradient to favor myopic policies. We propose a simple solution to this issue: we eliminate this bias by using an alternative, outer value function in the estimation of the outer loss. To obtain this outer value function we add a second head to the critic network and train it alongside the classic critic, using the outer loss discount factor. On an illustrative toy problem, we show that the bias can cause catastrophic failure of current meta-gradient RL approaches, and show that our proposed solution fixes it. We then apply our method to a more complex environment and demonstrate that fixing the meta-gradient bias can significantly improve performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2022.

Builds on

21 of 29 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  4. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  5. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  6. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  7. 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 300
  8. 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 281
  9. 2018RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewardscited by 162
  10. 2018Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
  11. 2019Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
  12. 2018On Learning Intrinsic Rewards for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 100
9 more
  1. 2019Improving Generalization in Meta Reinforcement Learning using Learned Objectivescited by 68
  2. 2020Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learning with an Objective Discovered Onlinecited by 52
  3. 2019Discovery of Useful Questions as Auxiliary Taskscited by 45
  4. 2021Bootstrapped Meta-Learningcited by 45
  5. 2020Discount Factor as a Regularizer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
  6. 2021A Theoretical Understanding of Gradient Bias in Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  7. 2022Meta-Gradients in Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 11
  8. 2021One Step at a Time: Pros and Cons of Multi-Step Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  9. 2022An Investigation of the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Meta-Gradientscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.