UPTON: Preventing Authorship Leakage from Public Text Release via Data Poisoning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider a scenario where an author-e.g., activist, whistle-blower, with many public writings wishes to write "anonymously" when attackers may have already built an authorship attribution (AA) model based off of public writings including those of the author. To enable her wish, we ask a question "Can one make the publicly released writings, T, unattributable so that AA models trained on T cannot attribute its authorship well?" Toward this question, we present a novel solution, UPTON, that exploits black-box data poisoning methods to weaken the authorship features in training samples and make released texts unlearnable. It is different from previous obfuscation works-e.g., adversarial attacks that modify test samples or backdoor works that only change the model outputs when triggering words occur. Using four authorship datasets (IMDb10, IMDb64, Enron, and WJO), we present empirical validation where UPTON successfully downgrades the accuracy of AA models to the impractical level (~35%) while keeping texts still readable (semantic similarity>0.9). UPTON remains effective to AA models that are already trained on available clean writings of authors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.