Active Learning with Expected Error Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning has been studied extensively as a method for efficient data collection. Among the many approaches in literature, Expected Error Reduction (EER) (Roy and McCallum) has been shown to be an effective method for active learning: select the candidate sample that, in expectation, maximally decreases the error on an unlabeled set. However, EER requires the model to be retrained for every candidate sample and thus has not been widely used for modern deep neural networks due to this large computational cost. In this paper we reformulate EER under the lens of Bayesian active learning and derive a computationally efficient version that can use any Bayesian parameter sampling method (such as arXiv:1506.02142). We then compare the empirical performance of our method using Monte Carlo dropout for parameter sampling against state of the art methods in the deep active learning literature. Experiments are performed on four standard benchmark datasets and three WILDS datasets (arXiv:2012.07421). The results indicate that our method outperforms all other methods except one in the data shift scenario: a model dependent, non-information theoretic method that requires an order of magnitude higher computational cost (arXiv:1906.03671).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2022.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
- 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2019Cyclical Stochastic Gradient MCMC for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 203
- 2020The iWildCam 2020 Competition Datasetcited by 86
- 2020Active Learning under Label Shiftcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023LabelBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Adaptive Label-Efficient Learningcited by 20
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learningcited by 15
- 2023Learning to Rank for Active Learning via Multi-Task Bilevel Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024Direct Acquisition Optimization for Low-Budget Active Learningcited by 2
- 2024Active Learning of Deep Neural Networks via Gradient-Free Cutting Planescited by 1
- 2025Batch Bayesian Active Learning with Partial Batch Label Samplingcited by 0
- 2026The Approximation Ratio for the Risk of Myopic Bayesian Active Learning for Linear Regressioncited by 0
- 2026The Approximation Ratio for the Risk of Myopic Bayesian Active Learning for Linear Regression7 Jul 2026
- 2025Batch Bayesian Active Learning with Partial Batch Label Sampling10 Oct 2025
- 2024Active Learning of Deep Neural Networks via Gradient-Free Cutting Planes3 Oct 2024
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learning15 Mar 2024
- 2024Direct Acquisition Optimization for Low-Budget Active Learning8 Feb 2024
- 2023Learning to Rank for Active Learning via Multi-Task Bilevel Optimization25 Oct 2023
- 2023LabelBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Adaptive Label-Efficient Learning16 Jun 2023