mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Measuring the Intrinsic Few-Shot Hardness of Datasets

arXiv 2211.09113 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While advances in pre-training have led to dramatic improvements in few-shot learning of NLP tasks, there is limited understanding of what drives successful few-shot adaptation in datasets. In particular, given a new dataset and a pre-trained model, what properties of the dataset make it few-shot learnable and are these properties independent of the specific adaptation techniques used? We consider an extensive set of recent few-shot learning methods, and show that their performance across a large number of datasets is highly correlated, showing that few-shot hardness may be intrinsic to datasets, for a given pre-trained model. To estimate intrinsic few-shot hardness, we then propose a simple and lightweight metric called "Spread" that captures the intuition that few-shot learning is made possible by exploiting feature-space invariances between training and test samples. Our metric better accounts for few-shot hardness compared to existing notions of hardness, and is ~8-100x faster to compute.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2022.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  3. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  6. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  7. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  8. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  9. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  10. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  11. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  12. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
14 more
  1. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  2. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  3. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  4. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  5. 2021Parameter-efficient Multi-task Fine-tuning for Transformers via Shared Hypernetworkscited by 278
  6. 2021Cutting Down on Prompts and Parameters: Simple Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 139
  7. 2017Bilateral Multi-Perspective Matching for Natural Language Sentencescited by 120
  8. 2021Improving and Simplifying Pattern Exploiting Trainingcited by 97
  9. 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 96
  10. 2019Probing Natural Language Inference Models through Semantic Fragmentscited by 64
  11. 2020Pre-Training Transformers as Energy-Based Cloze Modelscited by 52
  12. 2021Sensitivity as a Complexity Measure for Sequence Classification Taskscited by 28
  13. 2018Analyzing Compositionality-Sensitivity of NLI Modelscited by 26
  14. 2021Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description Lengthcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.